He said Whitfield was removed because he undertook an international visit without his permission.
Whitfield’s travel to the US was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of members of the executive, he said, adding that this requirement is known to all ministers and deputy ministers.
Ramaphosa said this practice is rigorously observed and adhered to by all members of the executive. However, Whitfield had deliberately chosen to violate this rule and practice.
Ramaphosa confirmed that he had informed Steenhuisen of his decision and requested he provide him with a name of a replacement.
“In that discussion, Mr Steenhuisen informed me that Mr Whitfield had been expecting that he may be dismissed on the grounds that he had undertaken an international trip without the president’s permission. This expectation, along with a perfunctory letter of apology that Mr Whitfield wrote to me following his travel to the US without the required permission, indicated he was aware that his actions had violated the rules and established practices governing the conduct of members of the executive,” Ramaphosa said.
He said Steenhuisen asked if there was a precedent for the move and he mentioned the axing of former deputy minister Winnie Madikizela Mandela by former president Nelson Mandela and former president Thabo Mbeki’s dismissal of then deputy minister Nosizwe Madlala-Routledge on the grounds of undertaking international travel without permission.
“Given all these circumstances there is consequently no reasonable grounds for Mr Steenhuisen and the DA to issue ultimatums and threats when the president exercises his constitutional prerogative and responsibility. Nor are there any grounds to try link this with matters that have no bearing on the conduct of the former deputy minister.
“There is really no basis for suggestions that the dismissal of the former deputy minister is related to any other reason than his failure to receive permission to travel and adhere to the rules and established practices expected of members of the executive.”
Ramaphosa said Steenhuisen had asked that he be allowed to brief the DA’s federal executive before the removal letter being delivered to Whitfield, however Ramaphosa argued that this would have had no bearing on his decision.
“It is the responsibility and the prerogative of the president to determine the timing and manner of the appointment and removal of members of the executive.”
TimesLIVE understands that the DA will hold a federal executive meeting at 2pm — an hour before the deadline hits for Ramaphosa.
TimesLIVE